Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
48
Highlights
18
Differences
5
Reactions
0
Likes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Telefunken U47:
48 Highlights & 18 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
ELA M 251E vs U47: Is the extra cost for the 251E's versatility justified? Learn which mic best suits your budget and recording style.
Which one’s right for your setup — Telefunken ELA M 251 or Telefunken U47? We’ve compared their product type, width, microphone type & connection interface, usability, and sound so you can choose the better microphone.
Features Multi-Mode Switch
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
with a difference of 70 points
Has on/off switch
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
with a difference of 70 points
Features Multi-Mode Switch
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
with a difference of 70 points
Has on/off switch
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
with a difference of 70 points
Telefunken ELA M 251E vs. Telefunken U47: Iconic Microphones Battle for Studio Supremacy
When it comes to legendary large diaphragm condenser microphones, both the Telefunken ELA M 251E and the Telefunken U47 stand as towering icons in the realm of professional studio recording. Both crafted in the United States and designed primarily for studio use, these condenser microphones cater to users aiming to capture voice and instruments with pristine fidelity.
Featuring a robust brass body construction with nickel finish and wired XLR connectivity, they are built for reliability and sonic excellence. However, while the U47 boasts a classic two-pattern design ideal for straightforward recording tasks, the ELA M 251E steps up the game with three selectable polar patterns and a lower Equivalent Noise Level, providing enhanced versatility and dynamic range for demanding audio applications.
The Pinnacle of Versatility: Telefunken ELA M 251E
The ELA M 251E is a powerhouse microphone that offers unparalleled flexibility through its three polar patterns: cardioid, omnidirectional, and figure-8. This multi-pattern switching feature allows producers and engineers to tailor the mic's directional response precisely to the recording situation, whether isolating vocals or capturing ambient instruments. Its 7 dB equivalent noise level makes it exceptionally quiet, which is crucial for capturing subtle nuances in detailed performances.
Powered via an external adapter or powering module, the microphone has a high max SPL of 138 dB, ensuring it can handle loud sources without distortion. The onboard multi-mode switch contributes to precise tonal control, allowing adjustment of its classic transformer-based circuitry to suit a range of studio applications.
Ergonomically designed, the ELA M 251E comes equipped with a shock mount and features a durable brass body with corrosion resistance, enhancing both vibration isolation and longevity. The kit includes a hard case, carrying case, cables, and spare parts availability, making it a complete solution for high-end studios that demand impeccable build quality and accessory support.
Timeless Elegance and Simplicity: Telefunken U47
The Telefunken U47 is synonymous with a legendary vintage tone cherished by countless professionals for decades. It features two primary polar patterns: cardioid and omnidirectional, optimized for traditional vocal and instrumental recordings that benefit from its warm, full-bodied character. Despite its simpler pattern selection compared to the ELA M 251E, it delivers a solid and reliable dynamic range of 124 dB, supporting a broad spectrum of recording scenarios.
This microphone also includes a slightly higher sensitivity (-34.89 dB output level), allowing it to pick up finer details with pleasing warmth. While its maximum SPL peaks at 128 dB, which is lower than the ELA M 251E, it still performs admirably with common studio sources. The U47's transformer design and studio-grade internal preamp confer classic sonic characteristics coveted by vintage enthusiasts.
The U47 is also well-suited for users valuing traditional setups, featuring the convenience of a mounting clip and a shock mount for vibration isolation. The packaging includes cables, a carrying case, and comprehensive documentation, along with a notably longer 4-year warranty, underscoring confidence in durability and support.
Quick Take
The Telefunken ELA M 251E excels in studio versatility and ultra-low noise performance with its three polar patterns, making it a top-tier choice for capturing intricate vocal and instrumental nuances. Meanwhile, the Telefunken U47 holds its ground through rich vintage tonality and straightforward usability, ideal for those wanting classic sound without complex switching or high cost.
Bottom Line
For studios requiring maximum flexibility, supreme quietness, and expansive dynamic range packed in a beautifully crafted package, the ELA M 251E is undeniably the premier choice despite its premium price. Conversely, if you wish to invest in a revered icon with authentic vintage vibes and solid performance that suits many professional workflows, the U47 offers excellent value as a more affordable classic microphone solution.
Verdict
Winner:Telefunken ELA M 251E - Superior versatility with multi-pattern selection, ultra-low noise floor, and robust build make it the modern studio's weapon of choice.
Runner-up:Telefunken U47 - Legendary vintage tone and simple operation accessible at a lower price, ideal for traditionalists and classic recording setups.
For those ready to commit to an investment in timeless professional microphones, both models deliver exceptional sound quality backed by Telefunken's renowned heritage and craftsmanship. Whether it's the expansive control of the ELA M 251E or the iconic warmth of the U47, your choice hinges on studio needs and budget priorities.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We tested Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 in real-world settings. Explore how they differ in specs, user control, sound response, and studio or live use cases.
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 are intended for Studio, Voice Recording, and Instrument use, making them versatile for various professional audio tasks.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 utilize a Shock Mount for mounting, which helps reduce unwanted vibrations and handling noise in recordings.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both microphones are designed for the Professional User Skill Level, indicating they are built for experienced audio engineers and musicians.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
85 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 was released in 2002, significantly later than Telefunken U47, which was released in 1947, showing a 55-year difference in their original designs.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Based on community votes for Year of Release,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Telefunken U47 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The U47 being from 1947 truly makes it a classic, embodying that legendary vintage tone. If you're chasing that historical sound, this mic is the one to beat.
The Polar Pattern Type for Telefunken ELA M 251 includes Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8, offering more versatility than Telefunken U47 which features Cardioid and Omnidirectional patterns.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
50 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Polar Pattern Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken U47 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The ELA M 251 clearly wins on versatility with its three polar patterns. Having Figure-8 makes a big difference for certain recording techniques, offering more options in the studio.
The Model Name for Telefunken ELA M 251 is ELA M 251E, while for Telefunken U47 it is U47, clearly distinguishing between these two iconic microphones.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
62 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251E is proudly manufactured in the United States, known for its meticulous craftsmanship and high-quality audio engineering.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface
23
Telefunken U47
0Votes
Audio Interface, Mixer
vs
Compatibility
Telefunken ELA M 251 is compatible with Mixers and Audio Interfaces, similar to Telefunken U47 which also works with Audio Interfaces and Mixers, ensuring broad studio integration.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
23 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 use a Wired, XLR Connectivity Type, providing a reliable and professional audio connection.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 belongs to the ELA M Series/Line, whereas Telefunken U47 is part of the Diamond Series, highlighting their distinct product families.
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
In the battle of Series/Line,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
60 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 fall under the Studio Recording Application Category, confirming their professional-grade capabilities.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 has a Width of 2.37 inches (6.02 cm), slightly larger than Telefunken U47's 2.36 inches (5.99 cm), a negligible difference in physical size.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
equal
2.37 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 has a Depth of 2.37 inches (6.02 cm), almost identical to Telefunken U47's 2.36 inches (5.99 cm), meaning they have similar physical profiles.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
equal
2.37 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
18.9
inch
0Votes
vs
Package Width
The Package Width is unavailable for Telefunken ELA M 251, whereas Telefunken U47 specifies a generous 18.9 inches (48.01 cm), suggesting a larger or more comprehensive packaging for the U47.
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
18.9
inch
0Votes
vs
Package Depth
Telefunken ELA M 251 does not list its Package Depth, but Telefunken U47 specifies 18.9 inches (48.01 cm), indicating the U47 package occupies more space.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 weighs 1.31 lbs (0.59 kg), which is lighter than Telefunken U47 at 1.48 lbs (0.67 kg), making the ELA M 251 slightly more portable.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 includes a 25 ft (7.62 meters) Cable Length, offering more reach than Telefunken U47's 16.4 ft (5.00 meters) cable, providing greater flexibility in studio setup.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
higher
8.6 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 is 8.5 inches (21.59 cm) in Height, which is slightly shorter than Telefunken U47 at 8.66 inches (22.00 cm), a minor difference of 0.16 inches.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
11.42
inch
0Votes
vs
Package Height
The Package Height for Telefunken ELA M 251 is unavailable, while Telefunken U47 has a Package Height of 11.42 inches (29.01 cm), providing specific dimensions for its packaging.
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone offers switchable directionality, supporting Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Bidirectional (Figure-8) polar patterns for versatile sound capture.
Telefunken U47
The microphone offers Cardioid and Omnidirectional directionality, providing flexibility for different recording applications. This is synonymous with its polar pattern options.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The polar patterns are selected via a Stepped switch, providing distinct, repeatable settings for Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8 modes.
Telefunken U47
The polar pattern switching on this microphone is Stepped, meaning you select between distinct, predefined patterns rather than a continuously variable one. The Telefunken U47 specifically allows selection between cardioid and omnidirectional.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Switching Precision,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 feature a Transformer design, which contributes to their characteristic sound and historical accuracy.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 utilize a Large Diaphragm Capsule Type, which is characteristic for capturing a rich and full-bodied sound.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 both feature a Frequency Response (Max) of 20000 Hz, covering the full range of human hearing for detailed high-frequency capture.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
equal
20,000.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
-34.89
dBV/Pa
0Votes
vs
Sensitivity
Sensitivity information is unavailable for Telefunken ELA M 251, but Telefunken U47 has a Sensitivity of -34.89 dBV/Pa, providing a clear metric for its output level.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
86
dB
0Votes
vs
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
The Signal-to-Noise Ratio is not specified for Telefunken ELA M 251, while Telefunken U47 boasts an 86 dB SNR, indicating very clean audio capture for the U47.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
This microphone operates in Mono mode, capturing a single channel of audio.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 has a Max SPL of 138 dB, which is higher than Telefunken U47's 128 dB, suggesting the ELA M 251 can handle louder sound sources more effectively.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
higher
10.0 dB
measurement.
Based on community votes for Max SPL,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken U47 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
For recording really loud instruments or vocalists, the ELA M 251's higher max SPL of 138 dB is a huge advantage. It provides more headroom and ensures cleaner recordings without distortion.
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Equivalent Noise Level
Telefunken ELA M 251 features an Equivalent Noise Level of 7 dB, while this metric is unavailable for Telefunken U47, indicating the ELA M 251 has a relatively low self-noise.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
Based on community votes for Equivalent Noise Level,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken U47 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The ELA M 251's 7 dB equivalent noise level is incredibly impressive. It's so quiet, which is absolutely critical for capturing every subtle detail in professional studio recordings. That low noise floor really makes a difference.
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 share an identical Frequency Response (Min) of 20 Hz, ensuring excellent low-end capture.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
124
dB
0Votes
vs
Dynamic Range
Dynamic Range is unavailable for Telefunken ELA M 251, whereas Telefunken U47 offers a substantial 124 dB Dynamic Range, allowing it to capture a wide range of sound levels without distortion.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1,000
Ω
0Votes
vs
Minimum Terminating Impedance
Minimum Terminating Impedance is not available for Telefunken ELA M 251, but Telefunken U47 requires 1000 Ω, which is important for proper impedance matching with preamps.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Output Impedance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
equal
200.00 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.5
%
0Votes
vs
THD
THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) is not available for Telefunken ELA M 251, but Telefunken U47 has a THD of 0.5%, providing insight into its audio fidelity.
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
75
Telefunken U47
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
vs
Acoustic Principle
The Acoustic Principle for Telefunken ELA M 251 is not specified, but Telefunken U47 uses a Pressure Gradient design, which is typical for multi-pattern condenser microphones.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
-34.89
dBV/Pa
0Votes
vs
Output Level
Output Level is not available for Telefunken ELA M 251, whereas Telefunken U47 provides an Output Level of -34.89 dBV/Pa, indicating its signal strength.
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Telefunken U47
0Votes
Studio-Grade
vs
Internal Preamp Quality
Internal Preamp Quality is unavailable for Telefunken ELA M 251, but Telefunken U47 is described as having Studio-Grade quality, suggesting superior internal amplification.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone uses a Standard XLR pin configuration, ensuring compatibility with all professional audio cables and equipment without requiring special adapters.
Telefunken U47
The microphone uses a Standard XLR pin configuration, ensuring compatibility with most professional audio equipment.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 utilize an XLR Connection Interface, ensuring professional balanced audio connections.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The Cable Detachable feature is present on both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47, offering convenience for storage and replacement.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Detachable on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 offer Analog and Balanced Audio Output Options, providing flexible and high-quality connectivity for studio environments.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone features a Balanced output, which helps to reduce noise and interference over long cable runs, crucial for professional recording environments.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 include Shielding Against RF Interference, which is crucial for maintaining clean audio in various recording environments.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 require an External Adapter and Powering Module as their Power Source, indicating they are tube microphones needing specialized power supplies.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The ELA M 251E requires an external power supply, often referred to as a powering module, to operate, providing the necessary voltage for its tube circuitry.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 feature Onboard Controls in the form of Switches, allowing for easy pattern selection or other functions.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
60 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 includes LED Indicator Lights, while Telefunken U47 does not specify this feature, potentially offering ELA M 251 users clearer visual feedback.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
higher
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
A crucial accessory, the external shock mount helps isolate the microphone from unwanted vibrations and handling noise. This ensures cleaner recordings, especially in a professional studio setting.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone typically comes with a detachable mount, allowing for flexible setup and easy replacement if needed.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone has swivel or pivot capability. This design feature allows for flexible positioning and angling of the microphone towards the sound source.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone grill is made of Metal, ensuring durability and protection for the capsule. The Telefunken U47 features a nickel-plated head grill, providing both aesthetic appeal and robustness.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Water Resistance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 comes with a Hard Case Packaging Type, offering robust protection, while Telefunken U47 uses a Box, which may offer less durability for transport.
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
The product package includes the necessary cables. For the U47, this means a dedicated power supply cable and an XLR cable to connect to an audio interface or mixer.
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cables on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Extra Windscreen,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Windscreen on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Telefunken ELA M 251 offers a 2-year Warranty, which is half the 4-year Warranty provided by Telefunken U47, giving the U47 a longer period of coverage.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 years
measurement.
Based on community votes for Warranty,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Telefunken U47 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
It's really nice to see that the U47 comes with a 4-year warranty. That's a significant show of confidence in durability and support, definitely a plus for long-term investment.
In the battle of Safety Compliance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Compliance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Telefunken ELA M 251 and Telefunken U47 support Multi-Pattern Switching, allowing users to adapt the microphone's pickup to different recording situations.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken U47 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken U47
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken U47
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken U47 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Telefunken U47 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
