Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
25
Highlights
42
Differences
5
Reactions
0
Likes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Sony C-800G:
25 Highlights & 42 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
The Telefunken shines with its clean capture and dynamic range. The Sony delivers that iconic, warm broadcast sound.
Trying to decide between Telefunken ELA M 251 and Sony C-800G? This microphones face-off covers tone, controls, design, and key product type, microphone type, connection interface & power source that musicians care about.
Telefunken ELA M 251E vs Sony C-800G: A Battle of Legendary Studio Condenser Microphones
Both the Telefunken ELA M 251E and the Sony C-800G stand as iconic names in the realm of professional large diaphragm condenser microphones, designed for use in high-end studios, voice recording, and instrument capturing. Each model boasts excellent sound quality, versatile polar patterns, and solid build quality, catering primarily to the professional user. However, while they both utilize XLR wired connectivity and balanced analog outputs, their core technical features, power requirements, and design philosophies differ in ways that influence their ultimate applications and appeal.
Embodying Classic Precision: The Telefunken ELA M 251E
The Telefunken ELA M 251E shines with a host of technical advantages that make it a powerhouse for detailed studio recordings. Its frequency response peaks at 20 kHz, offering a slightly broader audio capture range than Sony's 18 kHz ceiling. This wide frequency range supports incredibly natural and precise sound reproduction, ideal for nuanced instrument and vocal recordings.
Noise performance is another highlight, with an equivalent noise level as low as 7 dB, considerably quieter than Sony's 18 dB, which ensures störfreies, clean recordings even in sensitive setups. It also boasts a higher maximum SPL of 138 dB, enabling it to handle loud sources with ease.
Further adding flexibility, Telefunken's true multi-pattern switching includes cardioid, omnidirectional, and the much sought-after figure-8 pattern, widening its use in various recording techniques. Its external powering system, featuring a dedicated adapter and powering module, supports detachable cables and includes RF interference shielding, both enhancing reliability in professional environments.
Physically, the Telefunken is crafted with a durable brass body with a nickel finish, which is corrosion-resistant and equipped with a detachable shock mount allowing swivel and pivot adjustments for ergonomic positioning. Onboard multi-mode switches and LED indicators provide tactile control and visual status feedback, including a much-appreciated power indicator light.
The package rounds out neatly with a hard case, spare parts availability, and collectible brand stickers, rounding off a premium user experience at a significantly lower price point of approximately $12,995 at Reverb.
Legacy and Warmth: The Sony C-800G's Enduring Appeal
The Sony C-800G is heralded especially in broadcast and live performance settings for its signature warmth and presence, owed partly to its studio-grade internal tube preamp, which enriches sound with a smooth coloration appreciated by vocalists and broadcasters alike.
Unlike Telefunken's external powering, the Sony requires 48V phantom power, simplifying setup in modern studio contexts. While it lacks some LED status indicators, it offsets that with onboard mute buttons for quick silencing during sessions.
In terms of design, Sony equips the microphone with internal foam dampening, a built-in pop filter, anda windscreen to reduce plosives and wind noise; a distinct advantage for vocal clarity, especially in broadcast or live environments. Although its body is lighter aluminum with a matte finish, it does not offer detachable mounts or the same corrosion resistance as the Telefunken.
Accessories include adapters, a carrying case, and a warranty card, supporting Sony's professional broadcast certification, making it a firm favorite in reputable studios despite the higher price of around $16,998 at Sweetwater.
Quick Take
The Telefunken ELA M 251E impresses with its ultra-low noise level, wider frequency range, multi-pattern versatility, and rugged construction; all offered at a notably more accessible price. Meanwhile, the Sony C-800G delivers its famously warm, rich tone paired with professional broadcast credentials and built-in pop/wind filtration, positioning it as a star for live and broadcast use.
Bottom Line
Ultimately, the Telefunken ELA M 251E edges out for those seeking phenomenal clarity, extended sonic detail, and robust build quality ideal for detailed studio work, while also being budget-conscious. The Sony C-800G is perfect for professionals who value renowned tonal character, integrated noise-reducing features, and certified broadcast reliability despite its premium cost.
Verdict
Winner: Telefunken ELA M 251E - Superior audio performance with lower noise, additional figure-8 pattern, rugged nickel-plated brass construction, and better value pricing.
Runner-up: Sony C-800G - Renowned broadcast warmth, studio-grade preamp, built-in pop filter and windscreen, and professional broadcast certification.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We stacked every sound, control, and tech detail between Telefunken ELA M 251 and Sony C-800G. This side-by-side microphones review highlights what really matters — and what might surprise you.
As a Condenser microphone, the ELA M 251E is highly sensitive, offering a wide frequency response and excellent transient detail, making it ideal for studio recording.
Sony C-800G
A condenser microphone is a type of microphone that uses an electrically charged diaphragm to capture sound. It is often favored for its high sensitivity and broad frequency response, making it ideal for studio use, particularly for capturing vocals and acoustic instruments.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The ELA M 251E is a classic large-diaphragm tube condenser microphone renowned for its smooth, open, and detailed sound profile.
Sony C-800G
The Sony C-800G is a renowned, high-end tube condenser microphone, favored by professionals for its exceptional vocal reproduction. It's considered one of the best microphones in its class, especially for studio recording.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 was released in 2002, making it 10 years newer than the Sony C-800G, which was released in 1992. The Telefunken might appeal to those looking for a more recently introduced classic.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Year of Release on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 originates from the United States, whereas the Sony C-800G is from Japan. This spec differentiates manufacturing heritage for potential buyers.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 is intended for Studio, Voice Recording, and Instrument use, while the Sony C-800G offers a broader range including Live, Podcast, Broadcast, and Acoustic Measurement. The Sony C-800G provides greater versatility across different recording environments.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
PC, Mac, Mixer, Audio Interface
vs
Compatibility
The Telefunken ELA M 251 is compatible with Mixers and Audio Interfaces, whereas the Sony C-800G adds compatibility with PC and Mac. The Sony C-800G offers more direct compatibility with computer-based setups.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Side-Address form factor means that the microphone is designed to pick up sound from its side, which is typical for large-diaphragm studio condenser microphones.
Sony C-800G
The side-address design allows for more accurate sound capture, especially for vocalists and acoustic instruments. This configuration helps reduce unwanted noise by capturing sound directly from the front of the microphone.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Form Factor on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
This microphone uses a Wired connection, specifically an XLR cable, to ensure a robust and high-quality audio signal transfer to recording equipment.
Sony C-800G
The Sony C-800G microphone itself does not have a standard XLR connector. Instead, it uses a proprietary multi-pin connector that plugs into its dedicated power supply unit (PSU), which then provides a standard XLR output for connection to audio interfaces or mixers.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
This microphone is typically used by Professional engineers and musicians due to its high-end performance, nuanced sound, and significant investment cost.
Sony C-800G
With its advanced features and premium price, the C-800G is tailored for professional users who require the best sound quality in demanding recording environments.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Figure-8
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional
vs
Polar Pattern Type
The Telefunken ELA M 251 supports Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8 polar patterns, providing more options than the Sony C-800G which offers Cardioid and Omnidirectional. The Telefunken provides more flexibility for capturing sound from different directions.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 is available in Champagne, contrasting with the Sony C-800G's Black color option. This is a purely aesthetic choice for the user.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
This microphone is aimed at professionals in the audio industry, including recording engineers, musicians, and voice artists. It’s built to meet the high standards of advanced users.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
Studio, Broadcast, Acoustic Measurement
vs
Recording Application Category
The Telefunken ELA M 251 is categorized for Studio recording applications, while the Sony C-800G also extends to Broadcast and Acoustic Measurement. The Sony C-800G is suitable for a wider professional application range.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
This microphone is not a limited edition, but it remains a highly sought-after tool in the professional audio world due to its unmatched sound quality.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Series/Line
The Telefunken ELA M 251 belongs to the ELA M series, while the Sony C-800G does not specify a series or line. Users seeking a microphone from a defined product series might prefer the Telefunken.
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 has a depth of 2.37 inches (6.02 cm), significantly less than the Sony C-800G's depth of 7.63 inches (19.38 cm). The Telefunken offers a more compact design in terms of depth.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
lower
5.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 stands at 8.5 inches (21.59 cm) tall, which is shorter than the Sony C-800G's height of 9.38 inches (23.83 cm). The Telefunken has a slightly more compact height.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
lower
0.9 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 weighs 1.31 lbs (0.59 kg), making it lighter than the Sony C-800G, which weighs 2 lbs (0.91 kg). The Telefunken is approximately 0.69 lbs (0.32 kg) lighter, which might be preferred for portability or specific mounting needs.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
lower
0.7 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 comes with a 25 ft (7.62 m) cable, whereas the Sony C-800G offers a slightly longer 26 ft (7.92 m) cable. The Sony C-800G provides an additional foot (0.3 m) of reach, which can be useful in larger studio setups.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
3/8"
vs
Mounting Thread Size
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify a mounting thread size, while the Sony C-800G features a 3/8
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
2.37
inch
0Votes
2.25
inch
0Votes
vs
Width
The Telefunken ELA M 251 has a width of 2.37 inches (6.02 cm), which is slightly wider than the Sony C-800G at 2.25 inches (5.715 cm). The Sony C-800G is marginally slimmer.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
24.5
inch
0Votes
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
24.5
inch
0Votes
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
12.5
inch
0Votes
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 has a maximum frequency response of 20000 Hz, extending 2000 Hz higher than the Sony C-800G's 18000 Hz. The Telefunken can capture a broader range of high-frequency sounds.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
higher
2,000.0 Hz
measurement.
Based on community votes for Frequency Response (Max),
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Sony C-800G ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Telefunken's wider frequency response up to 20kHz is a big plus for capturing more detail, making it sound more open and natural. This slight edge in range can make a difference in high-fidelity recordings.
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone offers switchable directionality, supporting Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Bidirectional (Figure-8) polar patterns for versatile sound capture.
Sony C-800G
The selectable cardioid and omnidirectional patterns offer flexibility for various recording situations, from focused sound capture to ambient sound collection.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The ELA M 251E incorporates a Transformer in its design, contributing to its characteristic warm, rich sound and providing optimal impedance matching.
Sony C-800G
This microphone utilizes a transformer design, ensuring a strong, balanced audio signal, which is crucial for preserving the integrity of high-quality sound.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 has an Equivalent Noise Level of 7 dB, which is significantly lower than the Sony C-800G's 18 dB. The Telefunken will produce a cleaner signal with less self-noise, beneficial for quiet sources.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
lower
11.0 dB
measurement.
Based on community votes for Equivalent Noise Level,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Sony C-800G ◉,
which got 0 votes.
That 7dB noise level on the Telefunken is amazing. Much quieter than the Sony, which means cleaner recordings, especially for delicate vocals where every nuance matters. It's a significant advantage for pristine audio capture.
With a frequency response that reaches down to 20 Hz, the C-800G captures the lowest of sounds, ideal for both vocal and instrument recording, ensuring a rich and full-bodied sound.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
-32
dBV/Pa
0Votes
vs
Sensitivity
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify its sensitivity, while the Sony C-800G has a sensitivity of -32 dBV/Pa. The Sony provides a clear metric for its signal strength output.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
76
dB
0Votes
vs
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify its Signal-to-Noise Ratio, whereas the Sony C-800G boasts 76 dB. The Sony C-800G provides a measurable indication of its low noise floor.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
113
dB
0Votes
vs
Dynamic Range
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify its Dynamic Range, while the Sony C-800G has a dynamic range of 113 dB. The Sony C-800G offers a clear specification for its ability to capture both quiet and loud sounds.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 has a maximum SPL of 138 dB, which is 4 dB higher than the Sony C-800G's 134 dB. The Telefunken can handle louder sound sources without distortion more effectively.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
higher
4.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 has an output impedance of 200 ohm, double that of the Sony C-800G's 100 ohm. The Sony C-800G's lower impedance might be advantageous for longer cable runs or specific preamps.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
higher
100.0 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
vs
Acoustic Principle
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify its acoustic principle, unlike the Sony C-800G which uses a Pressure Gradient principle. The Sony provides specific technical detail about its sound capture mechanism.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The polar patterns are selected via a Stepped switch, providing distinct, repeatable settings for Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8 modes.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Switching Precision,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
Sony C-800G
1Votes
Studio-Grade
vs
Internal Preamp Quality
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify its internal preamp quality, while the Sony C-800G highlights its Studio-Grade internal preamp. The Sony emphasizes its high-quality internal amplification.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Based on community votes for Internal Preamp Quality,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Sony C-800G ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Sony C-800G having a studio-grade internal tube preamp is a huge selling point for me. It adds that classic warmth I'm always looking for in recordings, truly shaping the sound character. That's a defining feature for broadcast and vocal work.
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Capsule Type
The Telefunken ELA M 251 features a Large Diaphragm capsule type, a detail not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken is clearly defined as having a large diaphragm, often favored for warmth and detail.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The XLR connection interface is the standard for professional audio equipment, providing a balanced signal for optimal sound quality and noise rejection.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 features a detachable cable, a detail not specified for the Sony C-800G. A detachable cable on the Telefunken offers easier storage and replacement.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Detachable on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 offers both Analog and Balanced audio output options, whereas the Sony C-800G only lists Analog. The Telefunken provides the benefit of balanced audio for reduced noise over longer cable runs.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not explicitly state phantom power support, but the Sony C-800G confirms it does. The Sony C-800G is designed to operate with standard phantom power from mixing consoles or interfaces.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The C-800G’s balanced output minimizes interference and ensures high-quality sound transmission, making it suitable for professional studio setups.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone uses a Standard XLR pin configuration, ensuring compatibility with all professional audio cables and equipment without requiring special adapters.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 includes shielding against RF interference, a feature not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken offers protection against radio frequency noise for cleaner recordings.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
External Adapter, Powering Module
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
External Adapter
vs
Power Source
The Telefunken ELA M 251 uses an External Adapter and a Powering Module as power sources, while the Sony C-800G only specifies an External Adapter. The Telefunken requires an additional powering module, which might be a consideration for setup complexity.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The ELA M 251E requires an external power supply, often referred to as a powering module, to operate, providing the necessary voltage for its tube circuitry.
Sony C-800G
This microphone comes with an external power supply, ensuring it operates at optimal performance by providing the required voltage and current for the tube circuitry.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The C-800G does not feature an automatic power-off function, which is typical for high-end microphones as they are designed for continuous use in professional environments.
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
48
Volt
0Votes
vs
Phantom Power Requirement
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify a phantom power requirement, while the Sony C-800G requires 48 Volts of phantom power. This is a critical operational detail provided by the Sony C-800G.
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 is equipped with a power indicator light, a feature not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken provides a visual cue for its operational status.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
No
0Votes
Sony C-800G
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 utilizes switches for its onboard controls, distinguishing it from the Sony C-800G which uses buttons. This highlights a difference in user interface design.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify a mute function, but the Sony C-800G explicitly includes one. The Sony offers convenient onboard muting capability for live or studio use.
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mute Function on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
On/Off Switch
The Telefunken ELA M 251 has an On/Off switch, a feature not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken offers a physical control for powering the microphone on and off.
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 features LED indicator lights, a detail not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken provides visual feedback to the user.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 includes a multi-mode switch, a feature not specified for the Sony C-800G. This switch on the Telefunken likely offers quick changes between polar patterns or other settings.
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
A crucial accessory, the external shock mount helps isolate the microphone from unwanted vibrations and handling noise. This ensures cleaner recordings, especially in a professional studio setting.
Sony C-800G
A shock mount is included with the microphone to prevent handling noise and vibrations from reaching the capsule, ensuring clean, undistorted recordings.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251's body is made of Brass, whereas the Sony C-800G uses Aluminum. Brass typically offers more mass and resonance damping, while aluminum is lighter.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Based on community votes for Body Material,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Sony C-800G ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I prefer the brass body of the Telefunken; it just feels more premium and durable than the Sony's aluminum construction, giving me more confidence in its longevity. The build quality really stands out.
The Telefunken ELA M 251 features a Nickel finish/coating, contrasting with the Sony C-800G's Matte finish. This offers a distinct aesthetic difference between the two microphones.
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify an included windscreen, but the Sony C-800G explicitly includes one. The Sony C-800G provides an accessory to reduce wind noise.
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Windscreen on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 features a detachable mount, a characteristic not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken allows for easier customization or replacement of its mounting solution.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify an included pop filter, while the Sony C-800G comes with one. The Sony C-800G offers an integrated or included solution for plosive reduction.
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pop Filter on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 offers swivel/pivot capability, a design feature not specified for the Sony C-800G. This makes the Telefunken more flexible for precise positioning during recording.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
Sony C-800G
0Votes
Foam
vs
Internal Dampening Material
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify an internal dampening material, while the Sony C-800G utilizes Foam. The Sony C-800G specifies a material used for internal vibration control.
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 is designed with corrosion resistance, a protective feature not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken offers enhanced durability against environmental factors.
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The C-800G comes with a sturdy carrying case, providing protection for the microphone during transport and storage, ensuring it remains in pristine condition.
Whether a protective carrying case is part of the package.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
An instruction manual is included, providing guidance on setup, use, and maintenance to ensure users get the most out of this professional-grade microphone.
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 is packaged in a Hard Case, offering superior protection compared to the Sony C-800G which comes in a Box. The Telefunken provides more robust storage and transport.
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify if a stand/tripod is included, while the Sony C-800G explicitly states it does not come with one. Users will need to purchase a stand separately for the Sony C-800G.
Whether a stand or tripod is included in the box.
In the battle of Stand/Tripod,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Tripod on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify the inclusion of adapters, but the Sony C-800G confirms they are included. The Sony C-800G comes with necessary adapters, potentially saving extra purchases.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapters on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Spare parts are available for the Telefunken ELA M 251, a detail not specified for the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken offers better long-term maintainability for its components.
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 comes with a 2-year warranty, which is double the 1-year warranty offered by the Sony C-800G. The Telefunken provides longer peace of mind regarding product defects.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
better than
Sony C-800G ◉
, delivering
higher
1.0 years
measurement.
Based on community votes for Warranty,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Sony C-800G ◉,
which got 0 votes.
A 2-year warranty on the Telefunken versus 1 year for the Sony is definitely better. It gives me more peace of mind with such an expensive investment, especially for professional gear. Longer warranty always means more trust in the product.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The Telefunken ELA M 251 does not specify professional broadcast certification, whereas the Sony C-800G has it. The Sony C-800G is officially certified for broadcast applications, which is crucial for industry professionals.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
worse than
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
The ELA M 251E features multi-pattern switching, allowing users to select between Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8 polar patterns. This versatility makes it suitable for various recording scenarios.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ is
same as
Sony C-800G ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Sony C-800G
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
vs Sony C-800G ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
